P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Bluechip Services International Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vimon Air Travel and Tours (P) Ltd. – Respondent
P.R. Shivakumar, J.—This petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners herein on the file of the XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai as CC No. 6583 of 2007. The petitioners herein have been arraigned as accused Nos.1 to 3 in the above said case. The said calendar case was instituted on a private complaint preferred by the respondent herein for an alleged offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
2. The first petitioner is the company of which the second petitioner is the Chairman and Managing Director, whereas the third petitioner is the Executive Director. The issuance of process of notice by the trial Court to the petitioners herein/accused is challenged in this petition and the petitioners have sought for an order quashing of the criminal proceedings initiated against them on the following grounds:
Though it is true that the allegations found in the complaint that air tickets were booked for six persons on behalf of the first petitioner company for Madras-Kuwait-Madras under Invoice No.334 dated 19.4.2007 for a sum of Rs.99,000 and for the payment of t
Bilakchand Gyanchand Co. v. A. Chinnaswami
Rajneesh Aggarwal v. Amit J. Bhalla
Dilip Kumar Jaiswal v.Debapriya Banerjee
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Neeta Bhalla and Anr.
Green Earth Asphalt and Power Private Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra through PSO and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.