SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
J. Venkateswar Rao – Appellant
Versus
Vijaya Lakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: V.V. Anil Kumar, Counsel
For the Respondent: Ch. Siva Reddy, Counsel

ORDER

M. Satyanarayan Murthy, J.—This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the Order 10.10.2012 in I.A. No.719 of 2008 in O.S. No.659 of 2008 passed by Additional Junior Civil Judge, Cyberabad, Kukatpally at Miyapur, allowing an application filed under Section 151 CPC to appoint new Advocate Commissioner to locate the suit schedule plot with the help of Mandal Surveyor or Assistant Director of Survey and Settlement, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranaga Reddy District.

2. The respondent herein filed suit O.S.No.659 of 2008 for injunction simpliciter alleging that the he purchased a plot for Rs.12,000/- under registered Sale Deed, Document bearing No.9275 of 1990, dated 24.07.1990 from Erani Mallaiah and others and since then she is in possession and enjoyment of the property and the revision petitioner/defendant allegedly made an attempt to infringe or invade the legal right of the plaintiff. The schedule of the property is annexed to the plaint and described as follows:

“all that residential Plot No.116 in Sy.No.78 admeasuring 300 sq.yards equivalent to 250.80 sq.mtrs situated at Madhapur village Grampanchat, Serilingampally Mand

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top