SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Prem Bai – Appellant
Versus
Shyama Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.—This writ petition is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder the order dated 07.09.2017 passed in Title Suit No.117 of 2008 by which a petition filed under Order XXVI Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected whereby and whereunder the relief has been sought for by the plaintiff to appoint Pleader Commissioner to submit its report after demarcation of the suit property in the ends of justice.

2. It is the case of the petitioner as per the pleading made in the writ petition that a suit for specific performance of agreement dated 23.09.2008 for decree for directing the defendants to execute and register the sale deed pertaining to the landed property situated in Mouza Sonari, P.O. & P.S. Sonari, area measuring 32’ X 45’ approximately of land and house property consisting of 5 Kharaposh rooms bing Tisco’s holding No.96, A-Block, Sonari bounded by:—

North : Gally then Holding No.97;

South : Gally the Holding No.94;

3. The defendants, after calling upon by the trial Court, have filed written statements wherein it has been pleaded that being the suit property situated over there, a petition under Order










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top