SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
B.V. Nagarathna and K. Natarajan, JJ.
M.V. Krishna Murthy —Appellant
versus
Arun C. —Respondent
M.F.A. No.9692 of 2018 (GW)
Decided on 3.7.2019

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Miss. Sofiya Mansoor Advocate for Sri Kamaluddin Ahmed Advocate
For the Respondent:Smt. Sunitha M. Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
One cannot underestimate role of parents, particularly father in life of a daughter.

Headnote:

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890—Sections 17 and 25—Appointment as guardian and grant of permanent custody of child to respondent-father—Mother of child is no more and child is residing with her maternal grand-parents—Child being of a tender age of eight years, must be with her lawful guardian i.e., her father, as any delay in handing over her custody to her father would only create a distance in relation between father and daughter—Howsoever affectionate maternal grand-parents may be and they may take every care to bring up child, same cannot be a substitute for father (parents) bringing up daughter—Family Court was justified in allowing petition filed by respondent herein and handing-over permanent custody of minor child to her father and appointing him as legal guardian of child—To that extent judgment of Family Court is justified—But, respondent cannot be appointed as legal guardian to property of minor child—That portion of judgment only set aside—Parents rather than grand-parents are best guardians of a minor child, particularly when there is no reason or impediment, legal or otherwise, coming in way of handing-over of permanent custody of child to her father—One cannot underestimate role of parents, particularly father in life of a daughter—Appeal allowed in part. (Paras 17, 19, 22, 25 and 26)

Result: Appeal allowed in part.

JUDGMENT

B.V. Nagarathna, J.—Though this appeal is listed for hearing on interlocutory application namely, IA No.2 of 2018, seeking stay of the judgment dated 25/10/2018 passed in Guardians and Wards Case No.106 of 2017 by the I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Bengaluru, we have nevertheless heard learned counsel for the respective parties at length. We have also interviewed the respondent-father of the minor child Kumari A.Kushi and his second wife and the maternal grand-father of the minor child and thereafter, we have proposed the following judgment.

2. This appeal is preferred by respondent No.1 before the Family Court who is the maternal grand-father of the minor child Kumari A.Kushi, assailing the judgment passed by the said Court in G&W Case No.106 of 2017. The respondent-father of the child filed a petition under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for the sake of brevity), seeking his appointment as the guardian and for permanent custody of the minor child, Kushi. At this stage, itself we may observe that the maternal grand-mother of Kushi who is respondent No.2 before the Family Court has not assailed the said judgment.

3. Briefly stated the facts are that, Smt.K.Rekha Rani—daughter of the appellant—was married to the respondent on 01/06/2009 at Bengaluru. Out of the wedlock, they were blessed with a daughter, Kushi, who was born on 29/07/2011. The family resided at Chennai. On 22/06/2014, they were proceeding from Chennai towards Bengaluru. When they were near Kanchipuram, their car met with an accident. The respondent sustained serious head and body injuries, while his wife died on the spot. Fortunately, Kushi survived the accident. According to the appellant, he and his wife requested the respondent to permit them to take care of Kushi for a few months as they had lost their only daughter Smt. Rekha Rani in the accident. The respondent was kind enough to permit them to take care of Kushi for a few months. Thereafter, they requested that until Kushi completed her Lower Kindergarten, she could be with them, which was agreed to by the respondent. Presently, Kushi is studying in Baldwin’s Girls School in III Standard and till date, has been residing with her maternal grand-parents. However, on account of certain differences with regard to the custody as well as visitation rights vis-à-vis Kushi, the respondent herein filed the petition seeking appointment as guardian and for permanent custody of Kushi.

4. The said petition was contested by the respondents by filing statement of objections. It is noted that the respondent herein let-in his evidence as PW-1 and got marked eleven documents as Ex.P-1 to Ex.P-11 and closed his side of evidence. He was not cross-examined. No evidence was let-in by the appellant and his wife before the Family Court.

5. The Family Court raised the following points for its consideration:

“1. Whether the petitioner proves that he is fit and proper person to be appointed as guardian of minor child Kum.A.Kushi?

2. Whether the petitioner is entitled for permanent custody of minor daughter Kum.A.Kushi as sought in the petition?

3. What order? ”

6. On the basis of the evidence on record, the Family Court answered issue Nos.1 and 2 in the affirmative and has allowed the petition filed by the respondent under Section 7 read with Section 25 of the Act and has appointed the respondent as the legal guardian of the person and property of the minor child, Kumari A.Kushi and has also granted permanent custody to the respondent-father. Being aggrieved by the said judgment, the maternal grand-father has preferred this appeal.

7. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, Miss. Sofiya Mansoor and learned counsel for the respondent-father, Smt.Sunitha M. and perused the material on record. As already noted, the maternal grand-mother has not appealed against the judgment of the Family Court.

8. Appellant’s counsel contended that the Family Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top