SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Kallinath Shivyogi Dhange – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra alias Apparao Mdhukarrao Vedpathak – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Kallinath Shivyogi Dhange, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.—I have heard the Petitioner in person on 17.10.2018 at length. Considering that his submissions were concluded at rising time, this matter was posted today for passing orders.

2. The Petitioner in person stated that since his submissions have concluded, he be exempted from appearing today in the court.

3. The request put forth by the Petitioner is that the Trial Court should direct the advocates of the defendants to prepare a list of written questions in cross-examination and they should tender the said questions to the Petitioner witness in the form of interrogatories under Order 11 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Further request is that this Petitioner would prepare his answers to the said questions and he would tender those answers in written form before the Trial Court as his cross- examination. Such request was put forth before the Trial Court below Exhibit 41 and the same has been rejected by the impugned order dated 15.09.2018.

4. The Petitioner in person submits that he entered his affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief under Order 18 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 18.08.2018 in RCS No.69/2017. After being administered the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top