SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Lilawati Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Kundan Kumar Ambashtha, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Nipun Baxi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.—Heard Mr. Kundan Kumar Ambashtha, counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant.

2. Heard Mr. Nipun Baxi, counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent-State.

3. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 22.06.2004 (decree signed on 14.07.2004) passed by Sub-judge VI, Palamu at Daltenganj, dismissing the Money Suit No. 7 of 2000.

4. Money Suit No. 7 of 2000 was filed by the plaintiff for a money decree of Rs. 6,00,000/- against the defendants with interest pendent lite and thereafter till realization together with cost. The aforesaid amount was claimed by way of damage/compensation for the period from 1992 to 1999.

5. The case of the plaintiff as per the plaint was that the defendant no. 1 sanctioned construction of embankment on eastern part of the river Koel from Mohammadganj to village-Kadal Kurmi within P.S. Haidarnagar, District Palamu under the supervision of defendant no. 2, for the purpose of saving the adjacent land from being sub-merged. In course of execution of the aforesaid scheme and project an embankment i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top