VIBHA KANKANWADI
Jubeda Iqbal Rajkotwala (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Gangadhar Gadalkar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vibha Kankanwadi, J.—Present appeal has been filed by the original plaintiffs challenging the concurrent Judgment and Decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.123/2003 by 2nd Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmednagar dated 29.11.2004, whereby their suit for specific performance of the contract is dismissed, however, the defendants were directed to pay amount of Rs.2,90,000/- along with interest to the plaintiffs and the said decree was confirmed in Regular Civil Appeal No.171/2012 (First Appeal No.328/2005) by District Judge-13, Ahmednagar on 22.08.2017.
2. What is not in dispute is that the predecessors of the defendants viz. Chhabu, Gangadhar and Bharat were the owners of Sy.No.50/4/B and Sy.No.51/5 situated at Maliwada, Tq. Nagar, Dist. Ahmednagar.
3. Original plaintiffs had come with a case that Chhabu, Gangadhar and Bharat had agreed to sell the suit lands to their predecessor viz. Iqbal Rajkotwala in the year 1990. An agreement to sell to that effect was executed on 24.05.1990. The consideration was fixed at Rs.2,01,000/- per acre. Iqbal gave earnest amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the brothers. It was contended that the possession was delivered as part performance of the
Swarnam Ramchandran (Smt) and another Vs. Aravacode Chakungal Jayapalan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.