Back
R.D.DHANUKA
Rajkumar Chaganlal Shah – Appellant
Versus
Gunmala Chandrakant Shah – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.D. Dhanuka, J.—Admit on the following substantial questions of law:-
(A) Whether without filing any cross objections by the respondents, the Appellate Court could grant larger relief in favour of the respondents which were not granted by the trial court ?
(B) Whether the Appellate Court could have decided the application for additional evidence before commencement of the hearing the appeal on merits or not ?
2. Mr.Kadam, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 4, 7, 9 to 13, the contesting respondents waives service. By consent of parties, second appeal is heard finally.
3. The respondent nos. 1 and 2 had filed a suit inter alia praying for declaration and partition against the appellant and some of the other respondents in respect of the ancestral properties. The learned trial judge framed four issues. It was the case of the defendant no.2 that there the suit properties were already partitioned by a partition deed dated 15th February, 1959. It was also the case of the defendant no.2 that the suit properties bearing nos. 133/8, 133/9 and 34 were self acquired properties.
4. It was the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff and defendant nos. 3 to 9 were entitled to
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
