SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S.KULKARNI
Porwal Sales – Appellant
Versus
Flame Control Industries – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nilesh Wable, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Amrut Joshi I/b. Sanket Mungale, Advocate

JUDGMENT

This is a arbitration petition filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter for short “the said Act”), whereby the petitioner is before the Court praying that an arbitral tribunal be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under an agreement entered between the petitioner and the respondent, whereby the petitioner was appointed by the respondent as an exclusive stockists of the respondent’s products.

2. The question which arises for consideration in this Petition is as to whether the jurisdiction of this Court under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is taken away merely because the respondent is a small scale enterprise falling under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for short “MSMED” Act), and when no application/reference has been made by the respondent invoking the provisions of Section 18(1) of the MSMED Act.

3. The petitioner is a proprietary concern of Mr. Vijay Porwal, and is engaged in selling and marketing all kinds of kitchen appliances/products, at Pune in Maharashtra at the address shown in the cause title. The respondent is stated to be engaged in the bus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top