JUDGMENT

K.K. Tated, J.—Heard Learned Counsel for the Parties.

2. By this Writ Petition, petitioner husband under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21st November, 2014 passed by Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai below Exhibit – 6 in interim application No. 124 of 2012 in Petition No. A889 of 2012 directing the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 12000/- to the Respondent No.2 for minor child from the date of application i.e. 09.04.2012 till the disposal of the matter.

3. The petitioner also claimed relief for transfer of application No. 10/DV/2015 filed by the respondent No.2 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 27 Court at Mulund, Mumbai under Section 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and rules 2005 for various reliefs including for an order of maintenance at the rate of Rs.15000/- per month, to the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai for hearing and final disposal alongwith petition No. A889 of 2012 filed by Respondent No.2 for divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

4. During the course of argument, the learned counsel for petitioner submit that, at presen