SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Sushila Devi – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Prasad Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Prashant Pallav, Advocate, Monalisa Singh, Advocate, Shankar Lal Agarwal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.—Heard Mr. Prashant Pallav assisted by Ms. Monalisa Singh, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. Shankar Lal Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1.

2. The appellants have preferred this First Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.05.2008 and 05.06.2008 respectively passed by the learned Subordinate Judge No.I, Deoghar in Title (Partition) Suit No. 109 of 2006.

3. The appellants/plaintiffs have instituted Title (Partition) Suit No. 109 of 2006 for a decree of partition to the extent of 1/2 share in favour of the appellants/plaintiffs in property described in Schedule-I and IIA of the plaint and also for a decree of partition in favour of appellant no.2/plaintiff no.2 to the extent of 1/2 share in the property described in Schedule-1A and 2 of the plaint. It has been further prayed for granting permanent injunction against the respondents/defendants restraining them to collect the rent in respect of various shops situated at property described in Schedule-I of the plaint. The appellants/plaintiffs have also prayed for the cost of the suit and any other relief or reliefs to which they would be deemed entitled.

4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top