ORDER

T. Amarnath Goud, J.—This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 14.12.2018 in I.A.No.491 of 2018 in O.S.No.21 of 2009 on the file of the XIV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District (for short, “trial Court”).

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed O.S.No.21 of 2009 for specific performance basing on oral agreement of sale. The petitioners/defendants filed their written statement, contending that the suit was filed seeking the relief of specific performance of agreement of sale based on alleged oral agreement; that as the respondent/plaintiff as well as the petitioners/defendants are companies and juristic persons with an entity and legal personality, as such, there cannot be any oral agreement between two juristic persons; that the oral contract will not have any value in the eye of law and therefore prayed to dismiss the suit.

3. During the pendency of the said suit, the petitioners/defendants filed I.A.No.491 of 2018 under Order VII Rule 11 (a) read with Section 151 CPC, seeking to reject the plaint, contending that there is no substantial legal cause of action for filing the suit and the entire basis for filing the