SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Bhaonri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Prabhu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Dinesh Yadav, Advocate
For the Respondents: None present

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.—Petitioner by this writ petition assails the order dated 01.03.2016 whereby, the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment was dismissed by the trial Court.

2. Brief facts, which are to be noted for disposal of suit preferred by the respondent are that one suit was preferred by the respondent-plaintiff praying for cancellation of Power of Attorney given to the defendant-petitioner herein. While the suit was pending, another suit was filed by the respondent-plaintiff for cancellation of the sale-deed executed by the Power of Attorney Holder in favour of the applicants. The sale-deed was upheld and the suit preferred by the respondent was dismissed. Against the said order and the decree, first appeal is pending. In another case before the Board of Revenue, the respondent challenged the action of Power of Attorney Holder in getting revenue record entries on the basis of said sale-deed, which has been decreed in his favour.

3. The petitioners-applicants Bhonri Devi & Premlata in whose favour the registered sale deed was executed by the Power of Attorney Holder, have moved application for impleadment in the trial Court after the matt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top