SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Shampa Sarkar, J.
Sayan Sarker —Petitioner
versus
Austin Distribution Private Limited —Opp. Party
C.O. No.1470 of 2020
Decided on 21.1.2021

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee and Mr. Sukanta Ghosh, Advocates
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Zeeshan Haque and Ms. Payal Saha, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
Mandatory provision of filing written statement within 120 days from receipt of summons in case of a commercial suit will not be applicable in case of a transferred suit.

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Order VIII Rules 1 and 10—Commercial Courts Act, 2015—Section 15—Written statement—Limitation—Mandatory provision of filing written statement within 120 days from receipt of summons in case of a commercial suit will not be applicable in case of a transferred suit—In present case, on four occasions, dates were fixed for acceptance of written statement but business of Civil Court did not permit passing of an order of acceptance of written statement—Litigant cannot suffer for inability of court to hold proceedings on those days—An act of court should prejudice no one—Order impugned set aside and quashed—Commercial Court directed to accept written statement filed by defendant/petitioner and proceed with suit in accordance with law. (Paras 14 and 21)

Result: Application dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Shampa Sarkar, J.—This application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated February 18, 2020 passed by the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Alipore, in Money Suit No. 39 of 2019. The petitioner is the defendant in Money Suit No. 39 of 2019. By the order impugned, the learned Court did not accept the written statement filed by the defendant. The learned Court fixed the suit for hearing as an undefended suit.

2. The case of the petitioner/defendant is that the opposite party filed a money suit in the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 4th Court at Alipore on April 17, 2018. It was registered as Money Suit No. 166 of 2018. The defendant received the summons on May 16, 2018. July 13, 2018, was fixed for appearance of the defendant. On July 13, 2018, the defendant prayed for time to file the written statement. The learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Alipore, by order No.2 dated July 13, 2018, allowed such prayer of the defendant and fixed October 4, 2018 for filing the written statement. On October 4, 2018, the defendant filed the written statement, which was recorded by the learned Civil Judge in the order sheet. The learned Court fixed December 20, 2018 for acceptance of the written statement and thereafter March 19, 2019 and April 17, 2019 were fixed for acceptance of the written statement. The matter could not be taken up on the dates fixed due to resolutions of the local bar. On April 17, 2019 also, the matter could not be taken up due to a resolution of the local bar and September 20, 2019 was fixed for acceptance of the written statement. On September 20, 2019, the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 4th Court at Alipore, while considering the application for acceptance of the written statement came to the conclusion that the suit was in the nature of a commercial suit. Accordingly, the records were directed to be transmitted to the Commercial Court for trial and disposal. The said suit was then registered as Money Suit No. 39 of 2019 and the same appeared before the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Alipore. February 18, 2020 was fixed for passing orders with regard to the acceptance of the written statement. The learned Commercial Judge upon considering the amended provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure came to the conclusion that the written statement ought to have been filed within 120 days from the date of receipt of summons. As the same was filed after 141 days from the date of receipt of summons, the written statement could not be accepted beyond a period of 120 days as per the mandatory provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to the learned Judge Commercial Court, the present suit involved a dispute covered by the definition of a ‘commercial dispute’ under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). Upon consideration of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and ors. AIR 2019 SC 2691, the said court came to the conclusion that the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 came into effect on and from October 23, 2015 and the Commercial Court started functioning at Alipore on and from July 5, 2019 and as such the defendant was under an obligation to follow the time prescribed for filing the written statement under the amended provisions of Order V Rule 1 (proviso), Order VIII Rule 1 and Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applicable to commercial suits. The learned Court below placed reliance on another decision of the Calcutta High Court in the matter of RDB Textile v. Union of India & Ors. passed in connection with CS 214 of 2016.

3. It was urged by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, that the suit was filed as a money suit under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Commercial Court at Alipore started functioning on and from July 5, 2019. Prior to July 5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top