JUDGMENT :

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.

1. Heard Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned senior advocate assisted by Sri Harish Kumar Rasineni, learned advocate for the petitioner and Sri E.V.V.S. Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. As purely legal questions are raised and the basic facts for decision of this petition are not in dispute, with the consent of the parties counsels, the matter was heard finally and is being decided at the admission stage itself.

3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 12.11.2020, passed by the Special Judge for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes, Visakhaptnam in I.A.No.31 of 2020 in I.A.No.32 of 2020 in C.O.S.No.11 of 2018.

4. The petitioner herein was defendant in C.O.S.No.11 of 2018 and the respondent herein was the plaintiff.

5. Briefly stated the facts of the case as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner are that the plaintiff/respondent filed O.S.No.11 of 2018 for recovery of money of Rs.1,33,99,080/- against the petitioner/defendant with subsequent interest @ 12% per annum till the date of realization; for costs of the suit and for such other relief or reliefs as