SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARINDAM SINHA, SUVRA GHOSH
Bulti Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
Pintu Choudhury – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Pinaki Dhole, Advocate, Ziaur Rahaman, Advocate, Biplab Guha, Advocate, Kaushik Biswas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Suvra Ghosh, J.—Marital tie between the appellant and respondent was severed at the instance of the respondent by judgment and decree of divorce granted by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 5th Court, Malda, on 19-12-2014 in Matrimonial Suit No. 232 of 2013.

2. The respondent/husband filed the Matrimonial Suit before the learned trial court praying for a decree of dissolution of marriage under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The respondent’s contention, in his petition, was that the petitioner was his legally married wife by virtue of marriage solemnised on 21-06-2010. Though the parties started leading a conjugal life in the petitioner/husband’s house, the respondent/wife went to her father’s house off and on and preferred to remain there until she was repeatedly requested by the petitioner to return to her matrimonial home. The respondent left for her father’s house on 19-09-2010 to return only on 26-01-2011. She again left for her parental home with her cousin Proloy Bhakat with all her belongings on 02-02-2011, never to return to the petitioner again. Several attempts made by the petitioner to resume marital relationship with his wife fell

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top