Back
K.R.MOHAPATRA
Achyuta Moharana @ Narasingha – Appellant
Versus
Nabakishore Moharana – Respondent
ORDER
K.R. Mohapatra, J.—Due to outbreak of COVID-19, this matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.
2. Petitioner, in this CMP seeks to assail the order dated 27.11.2019 (Annexure-6) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak in CS No.129 of 2003 (I), whereby he rejected the evidence in affidavit of Smt. Jasoda Sutar (defendant No.1 in the suit) filed on behalf of defendant No.7-Achyutananda Maharana (petitioner herein).
3. Mr. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in C.S.No.1201 of 2003(I) filed for partition, Smt. Jasoda Sutar has been arrayed as defendant No.1 and the petitioner herein has been arrayed as defendant No.7. Said Smt. Jasoda Sutar has been set ex parte as she neither appeared after receiving the summons nor filed her written statement. In course of trial, defendant No.7 (petitioner herein) filed the evidence in affidavit of defendant No.1 under Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC intending to examine her as a witness on his behalf. The plaintiff objected to acceptance of the said affidavit stating that since defendant No.1 has been set ex parte and intends to support the case of the defendant No.7, without filing her written statement, she sho
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
