SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.V.NAGARATHNA, P.KRISHNA BHAT
Suresh S. – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. M.S. Nagaraja, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Ramachandra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B.V. Nagarathna, J.—These appeals are listed to consider the petition filed by the parties under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), as the parties have filed the said petition along with an application under Section 13B(2) of the Act, seeking dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce by a mutual consent.

2. M.F.A.No.9125/2017 is filed against the common judgment and decree passed in M.C.No.3794/2010 assailing the grant of decree of restitution of conjugal right in favour of the respondent/wife, while M.F.A.No.9126/2017 is filed against the judgment and decree of dismissal of the divorce petition filed by the appellant/husband in M.C.No.2444/2014. By a common judgment and decrees passed in the aforesaid petitions, learned II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Bengaluru, dated 23.10.2017 has allowed the petition filed by the respondent/wife under Section 9 of the Act, while dismissing the petition filed by the appellant/husband under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act. Hence, the husband being aggrieved by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top