JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Vikash Jain, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents through video conference.

2. The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition—

“(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for giving a direction to respondent no.2 & 3 to make registration of sale deed for sale of the flat of the petitioner constructed over the land situated in Mouza Bodhgaya Thana No.359, Khata No. 701, Khesara No.138 Area 1.78 Acre, which has been constructed on the basis of development agreement made between petitioner and one Smt. Chanda Devi, who is owner of the land abovementioned.

(ii) For giving a direction to grant compensation to the petitioner for the loss incurred to him, due to illegal and arbitrary decision withholding the registration of flat of the petitioner by the respondent authorities without any basis.

(iii) Any other relief/reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.”

3. The short facts of the case according to the petitioner are that he entered into a development agreement on 16.07.2013 with (1) Smt. Chanda Devi, wife of Late Rajendra Prasad (2) Sri Vikram Kumar,