SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 359

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J. 
Sachhi Malik and others - Petitioner
Versus
The Collector, Cuttack & Others - Opposite Parties
WP(C) No.32325 of 2025
Decided On : 24-11-2025
 

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B. Nayak, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel

The Sub-Registrar must independently decide on the registrability of a deed without needing clarification from the District Registrar, as their investigation into title is not permissible under law.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ petition to quash refusal of registration of a deed for sale by Sub-Registrar - The court held that the Sub-Registrar is empowered to decide on registration independently without requiring clarification from the District Registrar, as noted in paragraph 8.

(B) Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 68, 71 and 72 - The Registering Authority cannot delve into title issues when registering a document, confirmed in paragraph 11.

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged the refusal of the Sub-Registrar to register a deed of sale concerning land settled in their favor, citing government regulations that restrict transfer without permission.

Findings of Court:
The impugned order was quashed, and the Sub-Registrar was directed to register the sale deed.

Issues: 1) Authority of Sub-Registrar to seek clarification from District Registrar; 2) Sustainability of the refusal of registration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the Sub-Registrar must register a validly presented deed unless otherwise proscribed by law, affirming the principles of independent decision-making in registration.

Result: Writ petition allowed, impugned order quashed, and registration directed.

Table of Content
1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1.This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the Petitioners praying for quashing (setting aside) the order of refusal of registration to the deed for sale of the Petitioners passed on dated 16.08.2025 (Annexure-4) by the Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3) and to direct the Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3) to register the deed for sale (original of Annexure-3) of the Petitioners.

2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the Petitioners for filing of the same is that, the land in question was settled by the Government in favour of Kulamani Malik (who was the common ancestor of the petitioners) through lease case land on the basis of such settlement through lease case, the R.o.R. of the same was prepared under Khata No.570/62 in the name of Kulamani Malik. The said Kulamani Malik died leaving behind the petitioners as his successors. For which, the land covered under Khata No.570/62 devolved upon the petitioners and since then, the petitioners are in peaceful possession over the same. Thereafter, due to some legal necessities, the petitioners wanted to sale that land to O.P. No.4 (Abhimanyu Sethi), to which, the O.P. No.4 agreed to purchase. So, a deed for sale in respect of the said land under Khata No.570/62 was executed by the petitioners in favour of the O.P. No.4 and the said deed was presented on dated 13.08.2025 before the Sub-Registrart, Athgarh (O.P. No.3) for registration.

The Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3) without registering the said deed for sale (original of Annexure-3), he (O.P. No.3) deferred its registration and sought for a clarification from the A.D.M.-cum-District Registrar, Cuttack (O.P. No.2), whether the said deed for sale (Original of Annexure-3) is registrable or not.

After receiving the reply from the A.D.M.-cum-District Registrar, Cuttack (O.P. No.2) through letter No.646/2025 (DSR) dated 09.04.2025, the Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3) passed the impugned order dated 16.08.2025 (Annexure-4) and refused to register the deed for sale (original of Annexure-3) of the Petitioners assigning the reasons that, “The A.D.M.-cum-District Registrar, Cuttack has clarified vide letter No.646/2025 (DSR), dt.09.04.2025 that,

“The Orissa Government Land Settlement Rule, 1983 and other relevant Acts and notifications, generally restricts the transfer of leasehold land. The lease is typically granted for specific purpose, such as homestead or agriculture and the land cannot be used for any other purpose without permission and guided by the terms of lease agreement. The land should not be transferred when it holds the leasehold status.”

3. On being dissatisfied with the above order of refusal of registration passed on dated 16.08.2025 (Annexure-4) by the Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3), the Petitioners challenged the same by filing this writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for quashing the said order of refusal of registration passed on dated 16.08.2025 (Annexure-4) by the Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3) and to direct the O.P. No.3 to register the deed for sale (Original of Annexure-3).

4. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned standing counsel for the O.P. Nos.1 to 3.

5. Undisputedly, the property covered under the deed for sale vide Khata No.570/62 is under Stitiban status and the Petitioners have been paying rent for the same to the Government regularly and the Government has been receiving the rents of the same from the petitioners and providing rent receipts.

6. The Sub-Registrar, Athagarh (O.P. No.3) has refused to register the deed for sale (original of Annexure-3) executed by the petitioners in respect of the land covered under Khata No.570/62 in favour of the O.P. No.4 on the basis of the letter No.646/2025 (DSR) d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top