SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.V.NAGARATHNA, J.M.KHAZI
Srilakshmi – Appellant
Versus
N. Sudarshan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri. Pratheep K.C., Advocate
For the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: Sri. Rajashekar, AGA
For the Respondent No.1: SD

JUDGMENT

J.M. Khazi, J.—Being aggrieved by the Judgment and decree dated 16.01.2016 in O.S.No.65/2012 on the file of Prl.Judge, Family Court, Mysuru, whereby the suit filed by her came to be dismissed, appellant/plaintiff filed this appeal under Section 19 (1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 r/w Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. For the sake of convenience the parties herein are referred to as per their rank in the original suit.

3. In the said suit, plaintiff sought relief of permanent injunction to restrain defendant Nos.2 to 5 from disbursing retirement benefits to defendant No.1, till he makes arrangements for the residence and maintenance of plaintiff.

4. Briefly stated, the averments of the plaintiff are to the following effect:-

(a) Plaintiff is the legally wedded wife of defendant No.1, their marriage having been solemnised on 13.06.1986. After marriage, they led a happy married life. However, they are not having any issues. In view of dowry harassment, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant No.1. Since he deserted and neglected her, she filed a peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top