A.P.THAKER
Jigarbhai Pankajbhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
Natwarsinh Ganpatsinh Parmar – Respondent
ORDER (CAV)
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 3.11.2021 passed below Exh-5 in Special Civil Suit No.262 of 2018 by learned 10th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara, whereby the application preferred by the original plaintiff for interim injunction was rejected, the plaintiff has preferred this Appeal from Order under Order 43 Rule 1 of CPC.
2. The appellant is the original plaintiff and respondents are the original defendants. For the brevity and convenience, the parties are referred to herein as per the status assigned to them before the trial Court.
3. The brief facts, which emerge from the record, are as under:
3.1 The plaintiff has filed the above stated Suit for specific performance and cancellation of sale deed dated 5.7.2018 entered into between defendant Nos. 1 to 18 and 19 & 20. It is the case of the Plaintiff that defendant Nos. 1 to 7 has agreed to sell the suit land to him vide agreement to sell dated 22.8.2017 and part consideration amount was paid by the plaintiff. It is further the case of the plaintiff that it was agreed that after the revenue entry regarding legal heirs of the deceased joint owner Dilipsinh Ganpatsinh is certified in
(1) Merely because property is sold on lesser consideration then previous one, it does not ipso-facto make subsequent transaction illegal or malafide – Unregistered agreement to sell can be considere....
The delay in taking action after objections were raised, and the sale transaction to the new purchasers, did not warrant the grant of interim injunction.
An unregistered agreement to sell is not admissible in evidence and cannot be the sole basis for a suit for specific performance.
It is well settled principle of law that in an appeal against the exercise of 'discretion' by Court of first instance, power of Appellate Court to interfere with exercise of discretion is restrictive....
The Trial Court's discretionary power in granting or refusing temporary injunction is to be exercised in accordance with sound judicial principles, considering the prima facie case, balance of conven....
Doubt about the existence of a valid and binding agreement and the insignificance of the consideration paid by the plaintiffs disentitled them for grant of interim relief.
In contracts for the sale of immovable property, time is generally not of the essence unless explicitly stated, and parties must demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform their obligations.
Point of Law - Section 16 (c) of the Act of 1963 provides that specific performance of a contract cannot be enforced in favour of a person who fails to prove that he has performed or has always been ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.