Priyanka Dahiya VS Manish Raj

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Priyanka Dahiya – Appellant
Versus
Manish Raj – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.—Prayer in this petition is for setting aside the order dated 8.1.2019 passed by the District Judge, Additional Family Court, Karnal vide which an application filed by the petitioner-wife under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. to dismiss the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 25 of the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 read with Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardian Act, 1956 for claiming the custody of ‘A’ (name not disclosed) was declined.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 31.10.2010 and out of this wedlock, a male child ‘A’ was borne on 1.7.2015. Since the marriage between the parties could not pull on, both of them decided to file a petition under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 for granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent. The said petition was filed before the Family Court at Sonepat on 17.10.2017, i.e. just three months after the birth of the male child. In para 5 of this petition, both the parties made a joint declaration that they are living separately from each other since September, 2015 and they are unable to live together as husband