SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Imtiaz alias Imtiaz Basha – Appellant
Versus
J. Sreenivasulu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:M.R.S. Srinivas, Advocate
For the Respondents:G. Sravan Kumar, Advocate

ORDER

This civil revision petition is filed under Section 115 C.P.C. questioning the correctness of an order dated 12.02.2019 of learned Principal District Judge, Kurnool in I.A.No.1294 of 2017 in C.F.R.No.641 of 2017 in A.S.No.——of 2017. Defendant Nos.1 and 2 in the trial Court are the revision petitioners herein. The plaintiff before the trial Court is respondent No.1 herein. Defendant No.3 in the suit is respondent No.2 herein.

2. O.S.No.1267 of 2006 was filed by the plaintiff before learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool and the prayer was concerning mandatory injunction for demolition of illegal constructions and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein from making any offensive constructions. After due trial, the suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff. Finding that there was no response from the J.Drs., the decree holder sought for execution and filed E.P.No.4 of 2017 in O.S.No.1267 of 2006. While that execution proceedings were pending, defendant Nos.1 and 2, who lost their defence in the suit, thought of preferring an appeal. In the process, they found that there was 201 days delay and therefore, defendant Nos.1 and 2 filed I.A.No.1294 of 2017

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top