SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA, SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Ghanshyam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.—This is a defendants’ Second Appeal, wherein they have put a challenge to the judgement dated 11th April 2022 and the consequential decree rendered thereto i.e. dated 18th April 2022, passed by the Court of 3rd Additional District Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Appeal No.40 of 2018, Ghanshyam Singh and other Vs. Narendra Singh, as well as the judgement and decree dated 2nd May 2018 passed by the learned Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rudrapur District Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Suit No. 85 of 2007, Sri Narendra Singh Vs. Ghanshyam Singh and others.

2. A very peculiar situation, which has chanced to be considered in the present Second Appeal is, that the plaintiff (respondent herein), when on 24th May 2007, had instituted the Suit, in relation to the property, which has been described in para 1, 2 and 3 of the plaint, had sought a decree as against the defendants, by modulating the relief therein in the following manner:—

“(Matter in Other Language)”

3. The nature of decree which was prayed for in the suit in fact it would amount to be a decree for the grant of a decree of permanent injunction, praying for not to change

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top