SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANIL KUMAR SINHA, ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Satyadeo Tiwary – Appellant
Versus
Parash Nath Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh

ORDER (ORAL)

The petitioner is the defendant in a suit, bearing Title Suit No. 349 of 2005, filed by the plaintiffs-respondent nos. 1 to 3, for declaration of title and possession over the Schedule-1 land of the plaint with further prayer to remove the encroachment done by the petitioner-defendant from the land to the extent as shown by way of site map, attached with the plaint.

2. Issues have already been framed in the suit and after framing of the issues, the plaintiffs-respondents filed a petition, under Order XVI Rule 10 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, for appointment of survey-knowing pleader commissioner, inter alia, on the ground that at the time of filing of the suit, the details of encroachment was given tentatively and further during the pendency of the suit also, the defendant has encroached further upon the suit land. As such, in order to ascertain the actual physical status of the suit land and the encroachment made over there, it is necessary to appoint a survey-knowing pleader commissioner in order to arrive at the just decision in the suit.

3. The request of the plaintiffs-respondents has been accepted by the learned Trial Court on the ground that in a suit for r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top