SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBBA REDDY SATTI, SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Boei Rama Devi – Appellant
Versus
Suggu Ammaji @ Suggu Ammojamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri K. Siva Ramakrishna, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff in the suit filed above second appeal aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 05.07.2022 in A.S.No.100 of 2016 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SC & ST Cases-cum-XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2016 in O.S.No.269 of 2007 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bheemunipatnam.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this judgment are referred to as per their array in plaint.

3. Plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.269 of 2007 for permanent injunction.

4. In the plaint, it was contended interalia that plaintiff is the absolute owner of the land admeasuring 220 square yards in S.No.188/1 of Madhurawada village having purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 30.12.2002; that vendor of plaintiff got the property under a registered sale deed bearing document No.675 of 2002 from one R. Prabhakar Rao, GPA Holder; that plaintiff constructed two shop rooms within the schedule property in the year 2003; that plaintiff filed C.O.P.No.242 of 2005 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Bheemunipatnam and the counsel for defendant issued reply on 07.10.2005 with false allegatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top