SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA
Mamata Samantaray – Appellant
Versus
Saraswati Patra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Bibekananda Bhuyan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Banshidhar Baug, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Krushna Ram Mohapatra, J.—This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.

2. Order dated 20th December, 2022 (Annexure-4) passed in FAO No.162 of 2022 is under challenge in this CMP, whereby learned District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar dismissing the appeal, confirmed order dated 12th October, 2022 (Annexure-2) passed by 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bhubaneswar in CMA No.69 of 2021 (arising out of CS No.310 of 2017) rejecting an application filed by the Sasanka Digitally signed by Sasanka Sekhar Sekhar Petitioner under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

3. Facts of the case are not much disputed. CS No.310 of 2017 was filed by the Plaintiff-Opposite Party for eviction, recovery of outstanding monthly rent along with arrear electricity and water charges as well as for recovery of damages from the Defendant-Petitioner. On 6th April, 2018, Plaintiff filed her evidence in affidavit serving copy thereof on the Defendant. On 11th April, 2018, the Plaintiff was examined as PW-1 and exhibited documents as Ext.1 to Ext.15. She was also partially cross-examined by the Defendant. On 8th May, 2018, evidence from the side of the Plaintiff was closed and the suit was posted to 10th May, 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top