Gurditta Ram Chauhan VS Babita

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SATYEN VAIDYA
Gurditta Ram Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Babita – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate
For the Respondent: None

JUDGMENT

Satyen Vaidya, J.—Heard.

2. Petitioner was appellant before this Court in FAO(FC) No. 04 of 2022.He had assailed judgment dated 01.01.2022, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. in case No. 77/2019 by filing an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. Petitioner was aggrieved against the order of maintenance passed against him by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chamba, District Chamba H.P.

3. During the pendency of FAO No. 04 of 2022 and at the request of learned counsel for the parties a Division Bench of this Court appointed Sh. S. S. Sandhu, Advocate, District Court Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. as Mediator. He was requested to make an endeavor for an amicable resolution to the dispute. The Mediator, vide his report dated 14.05.2022 reported the mediation as successful. As per such report, the parties had arrived at an amicable settlement. Respondent herein had agreed to get her marriage with petitioner dissolved by filing petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short “The Act”) and had also agreed to receive Rs. 15, 00,000/- towards permanent alimony. Accordingly on 23.05.2022, FAO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document