SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C. KUMARAPPAN
P. R. Periannan (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Thasildhar Devakottai Taluk Office – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. VR. Shanmuganathan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Senthil Ayyanar, Government Advocate

JUDGMENT

The appellant herein is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants before the Court below.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts, leading to the filing of this Second Appeal, are as follows:—

Originally the suit was instituted by one Periannan, and after his demise his son was impleaded as second plaintiff. According to the plaint pleading, originally the suit property belongs to the plaintiffs and their predecessor in title and their ownership could be inferred by the registered mortgage deed executed by one Karuppaiah Ambalam on 03.10.1961. According to the plaintiffs, in the said mortgage deed, a reference was made about the ownership of the plaintiff’s predecessor in title over the suit property. It is the further submission of the plaintiff that, they have perfected title by way of adverse possession. Even the revenue records in respect of the suit property stands in the name of deceased – first plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, since the defendant refused to issue patta in the name of the deceased first plaintiff, he moved a writ petition in W.P. (MD)No.19267 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top