Siddaboina Radhika VS Bairaboina Santhosh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

K. LAKSHMAN
Siddaboina Radhika – Appellant
Versus
Bairaboina Santhosh – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Dasi Ramesh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Kodari Mallikarjun, Advocate

ORDER

K. Lakshman, J.—Heard Mr. Dasi Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vishwarupa Chary, learned counsel representing Mr. Kodari Mallikarjun, learned counsel for respondent No.1. However, as per cause title, respondent No.2 is not a necessary party to the present revision.

2. This revision is filed challenging the order dated 16.11.2023 in I.A. No.382 of 2023 in I.A. No.299 of 2023 in O.S. No.193 of 2019 passed by learned Senior Civil Judge at Narsampet dismissing the petition filed under Order - VIII, Rule 1A (3) read with 151 of CPC.

3. The petitioner herein is arrayed as defendant No.2, while respondent No.1 herein is the sole plaintiff in O.S. No.193 of 2019. Respondent No.1 herein - plaintiff filed the said suit vide O.S. No.193 of 2019 against the petitioner and respondent No.2 herein for recovery of an amount of Rs.6,48,000/- based on promissory note alleged to have executed by respondent No.2 herein - defendant No.1 and loan guarantee agreement alleged to have executed by the petitioner herein as she stood as guarantor to the aforesaid loan.

4. During pendency of the aforesaid suit, the petitioner herein had filed an application vide I.A. No.299 of 2023 und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document