SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Gugilla Aruna – Appellant
Versus
Adluri Ramesh Babu – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Bankatlal Mandhani, Advocate

ORDER

Heard Sri Bankatlal Mandhani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite service of notice, none appears for the respondents. Perused the material available on record.

2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the validity and legality of the order, dated 09.04.2019, passed by the III Additional District Judge, Warangal in O.S.No.228 of 2013, whereby the trial Court declined to receive the unregistered Award dated 11.06.2010 as evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, on the ground that the same is hit by Section 17 of the Registration Act.

3. The brief factual background which led to filing of the present Revision is that the suit was filed for the relief of partition of the suit properties into five equal shares and to allot one such share to the plaintiff by meets and bounds. The defendants filed their written statement and later, issues were settled for trial and the trial commenced. During the course of trial, plaintiff filed her chief-examination affidavit and intended to mark an unregistered Award dated 11.06.2010 passed by the Arbitrators in respect of partition of the family properties. However, learned counsel for the defendants opposed to mark the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top