P. Jayachandran VS A. Yesuranthinam (Died)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
P. Jayachandran – Appellant
Versus
A. Yesuranthinam (Died) – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. C. Shankar, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1: Died
For the Respondent Nos.2 and 3:Mr. G. Jeremiah, Advocate

JUDGMENT

The defeated defendants is the Appellant herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred as per their litigative status before the Trial Court.

The brief facts leading to filing of the Appeal Suit as under:—

2(a). The first Respondent herein is the Plaintiff in O.S.No.33 of 2013. He filed a suit for declaration of title of the Plaintiff over the suit property and for directing the Defendant to deliver possession of the suit property and restrained the Defendant from alienating the suit property.

2(b). The Plaintiff (Respondent herein) is the father of one Y. Margarette Arulmozhi and she was employed as a Head Mistress in the Panchayat Union School, Nagavedu, Arakkonam Taluk. She lived together with one P.Jaya-chandran (Defendant), who is already married person. Since Jayachandran’s marriage with one Stella was not dissolved according to the Indian Divorce Act, Jayachandran and Margarette Arulmozhi were living together without any marriage.

2(c). Jayachandan had executed a settlement deed in favour of the daughter of the Plaintiff under Ex.A2 dated 09.08.2010 and thereafter she died on 24.01.2013. Under Ex.A3 dated 02.04.2013, the settlement deed executed by J