SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Kherunisha – Appellant
Versus
Lrs of Jai Shiv Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shambhoo Singh Rathore

ORDER

The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 27.03.2023 whereby the application under Order XXII Rule 3 R/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as preferred by the plaintiff has been allowed and the application under Order XXII Rule 9, CPC as preferred by the defendant for abatement of the suit has been rejected.

2. The arguments of counsel for the defendant-petitioner are three fold. Firstly, after the death of plaintiff Jai Shiv Singh, the landlord, no application for substitution of his legal representatives was filed within the prescribed time and hence, the suit abated. Secondly, only the wife, son and daughter of the deceased plaintiff Jai Shiv Singh have been sought to be substituted whereas the four sisters of Jai Shiv Singh are also his legal representatives and they also deserve to be impleaded/substituted in place of him. Thirdly, the suit property is an ancestral property and hence, the sisters of the deceased plaintiff, being the coparceners, would also fall in the category of legal representatives.

3. The Trial Court reached to a specific finding that plaintiff Jai Shiv Singh expired on 04.09.2021 and application under Or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top