Kamlikar Jangoji VS Kamlikar Sajjanlal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

G. RADHA RANI
Kamlikar Jangoji – Appellant
Versus
Kamlikar Sajjanlal – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants in Both the Appeals: Sri Vedula Chitralekha
For the Respondent No.1 to 3 in A.S.No.139/2022 & Respondent in A.S.No.156/2022: Sri J. Rammohan Rao

JUDGMENT (COMMON)

These two appeals are decided together as the parties are one and the same and they are interconnected.

2. A.S.No.139 of 2022 is filed by the appellants who were the defendants 1 to 7 aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2022 passed in O.S.No.44 of 2018 by the learned I Additional District Judge at Mahabubnagar.

3. O.S.No.44 of 2018 is a suit for partition filed by the respondents - plaintiffs.

4. A.S.No.156 of 2022 is filed by the appellants who were the plaintiffs aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2022 passed in O.S.No.108 of 2016 by the learned I Additional District Judge at Mahabubnagar.

5. O.S.No.108 of 2016 is a suit for declaration, rectification of entries in the revenue record and injunction.

6. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants and respondents were legal heirs of late Chandoji. Late Chandoji had three sons by name Ramchanderji, Balram and Mohanlal and two daughters by name Jangamma and Laxmi Bai. The appellants in both the cases are the wife and children of Ramchanderji. Originally, the son of Balram by name Sajjanlal, son of Mohanlal by name Raju and daughter of late Chandoji by name Jangamma filed a suit