MAULIK J. SHELAT
Dilipbhai Laxmanbhai Kanani – Appellant
Versus
Kshitijbhai Manubhai Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT (ORAL )
This appeal is directed against the order dated 11th December 2006, passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur, below injunction application Exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit No. 187 of 2006. The appeal is filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as “C.P.C.”) by the original plaintiffs of the aforesaid suit. The respondents herein are original defendants.
2. As far as possible, hereinafter, the parties will be referred as per their original position in the suit.
History of Appeal
3. Before addressing to the issues germane in the appeal, the events, which have taken place and the few orders passed by my predecessors, need to be first observed in this judgementorder.
3.1. This appeal was admitted on 26th December 2006 and it has been so recorded in the order passed in the injunction application (Civil Application No. 15068 of 2006) that as per statements made by respective learned Advocates appearing for defendants, till the hearing of the appeal, their clients (defendants) shall not transfer, alienate or deal with the property in question and maintain status quo of the same. The order
Kashi Math Samsthan v. Shrimad Sudhindra Thirtha Swamy (2010) 1 SCC 689. (Para 40) – Relied.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.