Back
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M. B. SNEHALATHA
Rifa Fathima – Appellant
Versus
Salim – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.B. Snehalatha, J.—The point for consideration in this petition is whether the retirement benefits, such as pension, gratuity, receivable by the 1st respondent/ father is liable to attachment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, CPC) in a claim for maintenance and educational expenses by his own minor daughter.
2. The minor daughter, through her next friend and mother, filed O.P.No.498/2025 before the Family Court, Chavara, against her father/R1, claiming maintenance and educational expenses past and future, alleging that her father/R1 herein failed to provide maintenance and educational expenses to her. Her case is that, after the divorce between her parents, she is residing with her mother. Presently, she is a Plus Two student. Her father/R1 is working as LD Clerk in Panchayat Department, and he is due to retire on 31.05.2025; that though he has got sufficient means and income, he failed to provide any maintenance to her and failed to meet her educational expenses. Though in M.C. (DV) No.104/2009, the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Karunagappally, had ordered to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month, even the said m
Maintenance – Right of a wife or a minor child to maintenance supersedes employee’s right to claim exemption under Section 60(1)(g) CPC.
Retirement benefits, including commuted pension, are protected from attachment under Section 60(g) of C.P.C., while earned leave encashment is not.
The Family Court can enforce maintenance orders through pension attachment, but recovery is limited to one year of arrears, emphasizing the social justice intent behind maintenance laws.
Pension accounts are protected from attachment under relevant statutes.
Retiral benefits are protected from attachment under Section 60(1) CPC, as clarified by the Supreme Court.
![Moutoshi Chakraborty @ Moutushi Chakraborty VS Manju Deb [chakraborty] - 2021 Supreme(Tri) 157](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Tripura_2.png)
Dependants of a deceased are entitled to maintenance from the estate, regardless of already receiving a share, as long as the estate includes pension and has not been fully apportioned.
Gratuity payable to a deceased employee is attachable as part of the estate, provided it was not received by the employee before death, distinguishing it from cases of received gratuity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
