SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 228

CHITTARANJAN DASH
Mohammad Hamid Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
Najibun Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Trilochan Nanda, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. D. Biswal, ASC, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1.1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks to quash the order dated 20.04.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Sonepur in Cr.P. No.7 of 2023 under Annexure-1.

3. The background facts of the case are that the Opposite Party filed a Petition for maintenance U/s.125 of CrPC before the learned Judge, Family Court, Sonepur registered as Cr.P. No.7 of 2023. In the said petition, she stated, inter alia, that the present Petitioner is the husband and the Opposite Party is the wife. The parties are Muslim and they are guided by the Muslim Personal Law. The marriage between the parties was performed on 02.01.2021 in accordance with ceremonies as laid down in their personal law and it was consummated. The relationship between the parties continued only for a period of nine months and ten days. It is further contended that after the marriage, the Petitioner and his family members subjected her to ill-treatment and torture demanding more dowry for which the Opposite Party instituted a criminal case against the Petitioner and his relatives registered vide Tarbha P.S. Case No.270 of 2022 under Section 498-A/506/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top