Back
T.B.RADHAKRISHNAN, A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
Suo-Moto Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
T.B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
1. During the course of adjudication of different matters, this Court noticed that appropriate endorsements are not made on postal articles, which were being returned to the High Court without being duly served. Therefore, an order was issued on 6.12.2018 by the Chief Justice requiring the registration of this public interest litigation as a taken up matter with the intention to have requisite streamlining of matters in relation to service of notice through the institutions called Post Offices falling under the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. The said order reads as follows:
"During the course of adjudication of different matters, it is noticed that appropriate endorsements are not made by officers of the post offices as required by the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, for short, "the IPO Act", and the Rules framed thereunder, as well as other allied primary legislations and Rules. The expression 'officer of the post office' includes any person employed in any business of the post office or on behalf of the post office, as defined in Section 2(e) of the IPO Act. Chapter X of that Act contains various penalties and procedures. Sections 49 to 56 in that Chap
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
