R.S.CHAUHAN, T.AMARNATH GOUD
Parvatham Pentaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Represented by its Public Prosecutor – Respondent
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
1. Having been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), having been sentenced to life imprisonment, having been convicted for the offence under Section 379 IPC, having been imposed with a fine of Rs.2,000/-, and in default to undergo simple imprisonment of three years, the appellants, Parvatham Pentaiah, (accused No.1), Parvatham Narsaiah, (accused No.2), and Thoorpati Sailu (accused No.3) have approached this Court.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that on 07.06.2011 T.Sandeep Reddy (P.W.1) lodged complaint (Ex. P.1) at the Medchal Police Station wherein he claimed that his brother, T.Samath Reddy (the deceased), cultivates about Acs.2.00 of agricultural land and is also engaged in dairy business. As usual, on 06.06.2011, around 09:00 A.M., his brother went to their farm. While his parents returned from the farm in the evening, his brother, T.Samath Reddy, did not come back from the farm. Around 06:00 P.M., his neighbour, B.Naveen (P.W.2), informed him that he heard certain hue and cry from their farm. Therefore, T. Sandeep Reddy (P.W.1), along with his father, went to their farm. There, he discovered tha
Raja Ram Jaiswal v. Bihar AIR 1964 SC 828
Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India (1990) 2 SCC 409
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.