P.NAVEEN RAO
Karra Krishna Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. On 31-12-2015 recruitment notification was issued to recruit candidates to the post of Stipendiary Cadet Trainee Police Constable in Civil, Armed Reserve, SAR CPL, Special Protection Force and Firemen in Fire Service Department. The scheme of examination comprised of Preliminary examination, Physical Measurement Test, Physical Efficiency Test and final selection based on written examination. Petitioner applied on 17-01-2016. He belongs to ST category. Petitioner was successful in the written examinations as well as physical efficiency test and based on his performance, he was shortlisted for appointment as Stipendiary Cadet Trainee Police Constable in Armed Reserve of Medak District. After including his name in the provisional selection list, show cause notice was issued on 24-09-2017 informing that during antecedent verification it was found that he was involved in Cr.No.140 of 2016 of Narayankhed Police Station and that why his provisional selection should not be cancelled. On 04-05-2017 petitioner submitted his explanation explaining the background facts in institution of crime against petitioner and others and also contend that it was the brother of his father who
Avatar Singh v. Union of India
Commr. of Police v. Mehar Singh
Inspector General of Police v. S. Samuthiram
State of M.P. v. Abhijit Singh Pawar
Union Territory, Chandigarh, Administration v. Pradeep Kumar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.