SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Telangana) 276

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Mallaram Sanjeeva Goud – Appellant
Versus
P. Bhikshapathi – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard the counsel for petitioners, and Sri Gaddam Srinivas, counsel for respondents.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dt.04.07.2017 passed in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.144 of 2015 on the file the XIV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, confirming the order dt.04.04.2014 passed in Interlocutory Application No.242 of 2012 in Original Suit No.1329 of 2010 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at Lal Bahadur Nagar, Hyderabad.

3. The petitioners herein are defendant nos.1 to 6 in the above suit.

4. The 1st respondent herein filed the said suit against petitioners and 4th respondent for perpetual injunction restraining petitioners from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.

5. After receipt of summons, petitioners engaged a counsel by name Sri Police Venkat Reddy and Sri M. Bheeshma Chary, Advocates, to defend them.

6. On the ground that no Written Statement was filed by petitioners, they were set ex parte, and an ex parte order was passed on 23.01.2012.

7. Within thirty (30) days from the said date, on 21.02.2012 itself petitioners filed I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top