SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Telangana) 304

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
U. Venkatramma – Appellant
Versus
V. Ravinder Reddy – Respondent


ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. This Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt.22-11-2018 in I.A.No.1015 of 2018 in O.S.No.301 of 2012 of the Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda.

3. Petitioners are defendants in the suit. The suit was filed by the respondents against petitioners for perpetual injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with their alleged peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties.

4. Written Statement was filed by the petitioners opposing the suit claim.

5. The 1st petitioner later filed O.S.No.103 of 2015 against respondents also for permanent injunction in respect of the same property. Both suits have been clubbed together according to the learned counsel for the petitioners.

6. After the evidence of respondents was closed in O.S.No.301 of 2012, petitioners filed I.A.No.1015 of 2018 under Order VIII Rule 1 (A) (3) to receive certain documents and mark them as Exhibit ‘B’ series. In the affidavit filed in support of the said application, it was contended by the petitioners that they could not file these documents as they were not traceable at the time of fili

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top