SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Telangana) 9

K.LAKSHMAN
P. Lalitha – Appellant
Versus
M. A. Bari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. V. Ravi Kiran Rao
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Agastya Sharma

JUDGMENT :

Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 16.03.2006 in O.P. No.289 of 2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - District Judge, Nizamabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’), the petitioners preferred the present appeal.

2. Vide the aforesaid judgment the Tribunal dismissed the claim petition filed by the appellants - petitioners against respondent Nos.1 and 2, owner and insurer of lorry bearing registration No.AP-25/T 4645, seeking compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- on account of death of Rajender Kumar.

3. Heard Mr. V. Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel for the appellants - petitioners and Mr. S. Agastya Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No.2 - Insurer. It is relevant to note that the above appeal was dismissed for default by this Court vide order dated 29.06.2016 against respondent No.1.

4. According to the appellants - petitioners, on 22.11.2000, P. Rajender Kumar, after meeting his parents in Bodhan and thereafter his friend in Sadasivnagar village at about 10.00 p.m. while he was waiting for private buses to go to Hyderabad from Sadasivnagar village, lorry bearing registration No. AP-25T-4645 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent driving and at h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top