K.LAKSHMAN
V. Ramesh Babu, Advocate, Khammam – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Rep. by P. P. , High Court of A. P. , Hyderabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Mr. V. Ramesh Babu, an Advocate, the appellant herein, preferred the present appeal assailing the order of the Principal Sessions Judge, Khammam in Crl.M.P. No.369 of 2000 in M.V.O.P. No.98 of 1995 dated 05.06.2006.
2. The appellant herein filed O.P. No.98 of 1995 under section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, for grant of compensation of Rs.1,60,000/- for the injuries said to have been received by his client i.e. Goggilla Papaiah on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge), Khammam (hereinafter referred as ‘MACT’). On 01.05.2000, the MACT, Khammam, passed an award dismissing the said O.P. But in the said award, MACT, Khammam, has given a finding that the appellant herein created an accident, produced fabricated documents in the Court and therefore, directed to initiate proceedings under Section 340 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is relevant to note that no appeal was filed challenging the said award dated 01.05.2000 in OP No.98 of 1995 passed by the MACT, Khammam, under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. However, proceedings were referred to the Bar Counsel of Andhra Pradesh, which ordered suspension of the appellant from practice for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.