Back
K.LAKSHMAN
Sk. Hussain S/o Basheermiya – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , rep. by its Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Nizamabad Range, Nizamabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Vide order dated 28.11.2014 in Criminal Appeal No.2518 of 2014, the Hon’ble Supreme Court set aside the judgment dated 05.09.2014 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.487 of 2006 and remanded the matter back to this Court for fresh hearing after giving an opportunity to the Accused Officer to be represented before this Court, if necessary, through his advocate or through an advocate appointed by the Legal Services Committee.
2. Accordingly, the matter was taken up for hearing and heard Sri K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for the Appellant - Accused Officer and Sri T.L. Nayan Kumar, learned Additional Standing Counsel - cum – Special Public Prosecutor for ACB Cases appearing on behalf of the respondent.
3. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment, dated 14.03.2006, passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Hyderabad, in Calendar Case No.28 of 2001, the Accused Officer preferred the present appeal. Vide the aforesaid judgment, the trial Court found the Accused Officer guilty of both charges under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act’). The trial Court sentenced the Accused Officer t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
