ORDER :

1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. Briefly noted, the facts are as under:

Noticing that the original assignees sold their land in violation of the provisions of the Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for short ‘the Act 1977’) notice in Form-I was issued to the assignees and notice in Form-II was issued to the petitioner, who claims to be the subsequent purchaser. In response to the notice in Form-II dated 07.08.2019, a detailed explanation was submitted by the petitioner pointing out the deficiencies and the manner in which the notice was issued not fulfilling the parameters as required by the Act, 1977 and as held by this Court. Though these objections were on record, they were not dealt with in the order impugned and it was passed stating that the alleged purchase made by the petitioner was in violation of the provisions of the Act, 1977, and thereby, ordered for resumption of land, by proceedings dated 07.10.2019.

3. Placing reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Dasari Narayana Rao vs. Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally