T.VINOD KUMAR
Bijili School of Nursing – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T. VINOD KUMAR, J.
1. Since the cause in all these writ petitions is common, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. In this batch of writ petitions, the action of the respondent authorities in excluding the names of the petitioner nursing schools from the list of eligible schools for admitting students into General Nursing and Midwifery (for short ‘GNM’) training course for the year 2019-20 through web counseling, is under challenge.
3. The common case of the petitioners is that the names of petitioner nursing schools were originally included in the list that was released in pursuance of notification for admission into first year GNM training course issued on 22.07.2019. It is stated that the said notification has been withdrawn after the two days of issuance. However, upon the reissue of notification in R.C. No. 30082/N1/2019, dated 11.09.2019, the petitioner nursing school names have been excluded for the year 2019-20, into which students can seek admission into the first year of three year GNM training course. It is stated that no proceedings have been issued by the respondent authorities between July 2019 and September 2019 either putting them on notice or g
Dr. Rash Lal Yadav vs. State of Bihar
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Swadeshi Cotton Mills vs. Union of India
Whirlpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.