SHAMEEM AKTHER
Vallambhatla Purnachander Rao – Appellant
Versus
Thonta Balaramulu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, under Order XLIII Rule 1 of CPC, is filed by the appellant/plaintiff, challenging the order, dated 23.12.2019, passed in I.A.No.169 of 2019 in O.S.No.31 of 2019, by the V Additional District Judge, Bhongir, whereby, the order, dated 25.02.2019, passed by the Court below granting ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents/defendants, their henchmen and agents, from interfering with the possession of the appellant/plaintiff over the suit schedule property till 02.04.2019 and which was extended from time to time, was modified to that of granting status quo as regards possession of the appellant/plaintiff over the suit schedule property.
2. Heard the learned counsel for both the sides and perused the record.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff would contend that the Court below ought not have modified the relief of interim injunction into status quo. In the given circumstances, the Court below ought to have granted temporary injunction, pending disposal of the subject suit. The appellant/plaintiff has fulfilled all the requirements of Order XXXIX Rule 1 of CPC and ultimately prayed to set aside the order under challenge and
Chirapareddi Veeramma and others Vs. Sk.Mahaboob Subhani and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.