M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, T.AMARNATH GOUD
G. Tuhin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India rep by its Chairman and Managing Director – Respondent
ORDER :
(Per Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao)
This case illustrates how a family dispute between spouses causes collateral damage on others related to them leading to even financial institutions acting arbitrarily and causes hardship to them.
2. The petitioner herein is a practicing Advocate in this High Court. The 5th respondent was employed in Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Visakhapatnam.
3. Petitioner’s wife Prameela Rani and the wife of the 5th respondent by name Padmaja Rani are sisters. The 5th respondent’s wife is employed as Asst.Manager in Indian Overseas Bank.
4. The 1st respondent is the State Bank of India and the 2nd respondent is it’s branch at Masab tank, Hyderabad. The 3rd and 4th respondent is the Asst.General Manager and Authorized Officer, RACPC of the 1st respondent bank and the 7th respondent is the Chief General Manager of the 1st respondent Bank at it’s Local head Office, in Hyderabad. (They will be collectively referred to as ‘The Bank’.)
5. The petitioner is in occupation of Flat No.511, Uday Balaji residency, H.No.1-1-17/A, Jawahar Nagar, Hyderabad.
6. Accord
Jai Narain Parasrampuria v. Pushpa Devi Saraf
ABL International Ltd. and another Vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.